[757labs] Media Server

[Jody Franklin]

Obviously we'd run dual stack, and it's really no problem at all to  
point v4 and v6 at the same FQDN so long as end to end is setup right,  
which in the lab we'll have control of.

Cox won't be able to route it native until DOCSIS 3 rolls out, and I  
know people internally who are betaing it now.

I don't know about he or others but sixxs says it'll stay free until  
there's no need, then they'll disolve.

I'm a big cheer leader for converting though, and went dual stack at  
home over a year ago, so I'm biased.

- Jody


On Jan 19, 2010, at 16:42, ethan at 757.org wrote:

> I've used it. It's fine as long as public sites have both a v4 and  
> v6 host
> name with separate DNS entries. Internally, I'd say stick with both.
>
> AMX can't do v6, projector can't do v6. It's cool to say you have it  
> but
> honeslty a PITA past that :-)
>
> Cox can't route it, either. You have to rely on tunnel brokers  
> externally.
> And some day they are going to take away the freeness.